Welcome to Gaia! :: Liberalism, atheism, male sexual exclusivity linked to IQ | Forum

Welcome to Gaia's forums, where millions discuss thousands of topics a day.

Lurking is creepy. Quit skulking in the shadows and join the conversation!

ADVERTISEMENT

Liberalism, atheism, male sexual exclusivity linked to IQ 

Share:
forum:58, topic:59067955
1 2 3 4 5 >
Quote:
(CNN) -- Political, religious and sexual behaviors may be reflections of intelligence, a new study finds.
Evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa at the the London School of Economics and Political Science correlated data on these behaviors with IQ from a large national U.S. sample and found that, on average, people who identified as liberal and atheist had higher IQs. This applied also to sexual exclusivity in men, but not in women. The findings will be published in the March 2010 issue of Social Psychology Quarterly.
The IQ differences, while statistically significant, are not stunning -- on the order of 6 to 11 points -- and the data should not be used to stereotype or make assumptions about people, experts say. But they show how certain patterns of identifying with particular ideologies develop, and how some people's behaviors come to be.
The reasoning is that sexual exclusivity in men, liberalism and atheism all go against what would be expected given humans' evolutionary past. In other words, none of these traits would have benefited our early human ancestors, but higher intelligence may be associated with them.


http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/02/26/liberals.atheists.sex.intelligence/index.html?hpt=C2
 
     
 
Meh, it's sociology. Weak correlation at best, with no way to control for variables as the groups are self-selected.
     
gonk same old s**t
 
     
- NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSIT -
 
Redem
Meh, it's sociology. Weak correlation at best, with no way to control for variables as the groups are self-selected.


Thats only because Humanist Bourgeois wont allow it wink
     
Redem
Meh, it's sociology. Weak correlation at best, with no way to control for variables as the groups are self-selected.


Thats only because Humanist Bourgeois wont allow it wink
 
     
 
dio777
gonk same old s**t
     
Signature on vacation.
Resid3nt
Quote:
(CNN) -- Political, religious and sexual behaviors may be reflections of intelligence, a new study finds.
Evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa at the the London School of Economics and Political Science correlated data on these behaviors with IQ from a large national U.S. sample and found that, on average, people who identified as liberal and atheist had higher IQs. This applied also to sexual exclusivity in men, but not in women. The findings will be published in the March 2010 issue of Social Psychology Quarterly.
The IQ differences, while statistically significant, are not stunning -- on the order of 6 to 11 points -- and the data should not be used to stereotype or make assumptions about people, experts say. But they show how certain patterns of identifying with particular ideologies develop, and how some people's behaviors come to be.
The reasoning is that sexual exclusivity in men, liberalism and atheism all go against what would be expected given humans' evolutionary past. In other words, none of these traits would have benefited our early human ancestors, but higher intelligence may be associated with them.


IQ]http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/02/26/liberals.atheists.sex.intelligence/index.html?hpt=C2
IQ is outdated, why would you post such a study that is even to a social science and take it serious?

Also CNN and this study must hate non-theist since they throw slurs at them a lot.
 
     


I should round up all people who are bisexual, homosexual and heterosexual and feed them in troughs filled with their sexuality fantasies from the media.
 
What about Libertarian and Atheist?
     
I thought everyone knew IQ was bullshit? wow.
 
     
 
It's not bullshit, it's simply not a perfect measure of intelligence. However, we don't have a perfect measure of intelligence, anyway, so that's not a great objection. We don't even agree what intelligence actually is.

But IQ is better than nothing.
     
Redem
But IQ is better than nothing.


I disagree. Most people view it as a test of general intelligence but blacks score lower than whites and low-income people lower than well-off ones. Obviously it's a test of education more than anything inherent. I'd say it's worse than nothing if the message is being sent that people with lower IQ scores are actually less intelligent than others if these are the results.
 
     
Anarchism is a sense of injustice in our world, faith in humanity's potential to transcend social structures that produce injustice, and the obligation to do something about it. Anarchism is also the rejection of all political, social, and economic hierarchy. It is anti-statist because the state represents a professional bureaucracy removed from the control of the people and anticapitalist because capitalism is an oppressive economic system. These ideas survive despite the lack of a political movement.
 
This shows that people tend to be liberal/atheist when they have average IQs. However this survey was done in London which demographically different from the US. For one less then 10% of the people in England attends church services. While in the US about 43% attend church on a weekly basis. Also England tends to lean more liberal which is seen with the massive amount of government control the English face on a daily basis where as the US tends to be more conservative.
     
Mister Wilde
Redem
But IQ is better than nothing.


I disagree. Most people view it as a test of general intelligence but blacks score lower than whites and low-income people lower than well-off ones. Obviously it's a test of education more than anything inherent. I'd say it's worse than nothing if the message is being sent that people with lower IQ scores are actually less intelligent than others if these are the results.
Intelligence tests that weakly correlate to education are imperfect, but not useless. We have nothing better for measuring such things, so this is what we use. If you have something better please let us know, but without that, we have IQ.
 
     
 
Mister Wilde
Redem
But IQ is better than nothing.


I disagree. Most people view it as a test of general intelligence but blacks score lower than whites and low-income people lower than well-off ones. Obviously it's a test of education more than anything inherent. I'd say it's worse than nothing if the message is being sent that people with lower IQ scores are actually less intelligent than others if these are the results.

IQ tests are useful for identifying students with learning disabilities. The test is far from perfect in anyway but it does measure intelligence, achievement, and performance. Some test are better then others for example Goodenough-Harris Drawing test is useless and if you have taken this test you should take another because it doesn't show s**t. Where as the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised is a good test with decently reliable results.
     
[image]http://iamhilarious.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/1236166573_steven_seagal_shooting_kids.gif[/image]
The God Hunter
Mister Wilde
Redem
But IQ is better than nothing.


I disagree. Most people view it as a test of general intelligence but blacks score lower than whites and low-income people lower than well-off ones. Obviously it's a test of education more than anything inherent. I'd say it's worse than nothing if the message is being sent that people with lower IQ scores are actually less intelligent than others if these are the results.

IQ tests are useful for identifying students with learning disabilities. The test is far from perfect in anyway but it does measure intelligence, achievement, and performance. Some test are better then others for example Goodenough-Harris Drawing test is useless and if you have taken this test you should take another because it doesn't show s**t. Where as the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised is a good test with decently reliable results.


Had it stated twenty to thirty points median difference, I'd possibly consider it significant, but 6 or so points is, to be blunt, irrelevant.
 
     
Bill Clinton said: "Thank you for having me to speak to your group this first evening before spring, better known by my former vice president as 'proof of global warming'.
1 2 3 4 5 >

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get Items
Get Gaia Cash
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Gaia's Story
Gaia's MMO